Brief summary of decisions during & issues needing to be addressed after October 24 E2 teleconference. Present: Carleton: Christensen CIT: Anderson, Drever, Marka, Matone, Mours, Yamamoto, Zweizig Florida: Klimenko, Whiting Loyola: McHugh LHO: Butler, Landry, McCarthy, Raab, Savage, Sigg, Whitcomb LLO: Daw LSU: Johnson Michigan: Gustafson, Riles MIT: Adhikari, Fritschel, Shoemaker, Sylvestre, Zucker Oregon: Rakhola, Schofield, Strom Reduced data set: * There were strong objections to any decimation of channels in a reduced data set, both because of skepticism that decimation could be implemented reliably, especially in the remaining time, and because some investigators believe they will need the full bandwidth (if not more) of certain channels. * We will have approximately 0.5 TB of disk space on fortress for reduced E2 data after the run. This is less than what is needed to store one week of data with all of the channels requested so far. There is also a tape robot, and it was suggested we should get accustomed to analysis from tape on fortress, since that will be necessary in the future. * Team leaders are asked to send specific data channel requests to David Strom (strom@bovine.uoregon.edu) by the end of this week (with a cc to me). The agenda page of the meeting: http://www-mhp.physics.lsa.umich.edu/~keithr/lscdc/agenda2_e2.html contains links to a proposed baseline set of reduced data channels and to the current channels in the Hanford data stream. Teams should specify by name the channels to be added and any dependence of that channel selection on IFO configuration or on time. For example, we may decide to generate a generic reduced data set for every group for the entire uptime of the interferometer, regardless of configuration (e.g., 70% of a week) and an "expanded reduced" data set (including some test points not available in raw data frames) for one or two shifts when the IFO is locked stably in a 1-arm or 1-arm+PRM configuration. Some teams interested in only a handful of channels or needing only a very short period of data may wish to request a dedicated reduced data set for their post-run analysis. * Once the channel requests are in and the data volumes tabulated, the results will be posted and a proposal made for action, which may involve defining two (or more) reduced data sets for general use. Specific IFO configuration requests or invasive measurements: Tidal group: Full day of stable 1-arm running with alternation between X and Y arms (2 hours each suggested, but more thought will be given to this) Correlations group: Hours of stable 1-arm running Lock-loss group: Period during one shift to try modulation of laser intensity Seismic group: 1-arm locks most useful Stationarity group: No special configuration Calibration stability group: Would like time with both arms locked to attempt swept sines. Ideally would like 1 swept sine per day and a dedicated half-shift early on to work out the algorithm (level settings, repetitions, resolution, etc.) Would also like to inject 20 calibration lines continuously during the week on the input and end test masses at frequencies above and below unity gain frequency. Gaussianity group: No special configuration Angular fluctuations group: Stable 1-arm running with wave front sensing Impulses/transients group: Can do some useful work with only laser and mode cleaner locked. Would like stable 1 arm running to look for suspension wire releases. Bursts/chirps group: No special configuration End-to-end timing group: No special configuration Data integrity group: No special configuration Line noise group: No special configuration Data compression group: No special configuration Frequency noise group: Both 1-arm and full-IFO running. Would like to inject noise at test points. Request 2 dedicated shifts, 1 for each configuration.