Operations:

• H1 behaved reasonably well, giving inspiral ranges > 1 Mpc. Calibration performed and used by SenseMon.
• H2 cooperated more than expected, entering common mode.
• L1 did not cooperate well, but we "fooled" the DMT monitors into thinking it had reached science mode

DMT Monitors:

• Core monitors (SenseMon, LockLoss, LineMon, DataQual, TimeMon, etc.) functioned sensibly in both runs
  (But note that SenseMon does not yet have correction for dynamic input matrix element, and we had no up-to-date L1 calibration functions to feed to it during M4)
• Figures of merit plots resurrected (updated at LHO, merely renamed at LLO because of high noise conditions)
• New or significantly upgraded DMT monitors exercised by teams of volunteers (LHO, LLO), including DMT authors looking at other monitors
• Reports on monitors entered into Elog (M3 and M4) (responses from authors later in this meeting)

Summary:

• On the whole, the mini-runs proved useful both in forcing us to revive DMT monitors that had fallen into disrepair and in letting us exercise the old monitors and test the new ones. Ran into the usual problem of having unstable IFO's in a run held in the midst of commissioning.
• Core monitors in reasonably good shape
• Most new monitors need significant work to be ready for prime time
• Need to make good use of post-freeze interim before E10 to finish shaking down the programs
• Many thanks to site staff for hosting the runs, getting the IFO's into running states, and helping test monitors. Thanks too to the DMT authors who travelled to the sites and placed themselves on call (M3, M4).