S5 Segment Data Quality Repository

Quick link: most recent version of segment lists (at bottom of page)

This page has links to files containing information about science-mode segments in each detector during the S5 run. Science mode segment numbers for each interferometer were incremented each time a control room operator pushed the "GO" button to indicate start of science mode conditions. As in the past, the segment numbers will be permanent, and many e-log entries refer to them by IFO and segment index (e.g., H1-27). This repository provides data quality summary information on individual segments, based on the work of many investigators. Data quality flags are listed for time intervals, and links to more detailed information are provided, where appropriate. Links to segment manipulation tools (e.g, segwizard) are also included. An extensive set of data quality investigations are described in detail on John Zweizig's data quality investigation page. Note that segwizard (Peter Shawhan) derives its segment information from a daily automated dump from the database, not from the files in this repository. In contrast to previous science runs, the definitive source of segment lists is NOT this repository, but is instead the segment database set up and maintained by Duncan Brown. Kept here are
  1. A nearly up-to-date distillation of the database (updated once per day).
  2. Detailed information (or links) concerning the investigations that have led to inserted data quality flags.
The flags in the database are inserted in two different ways:
  1. Automatic insertion using dmtdq_seg_insert based on minute trends produced by online DMT monitors (John Zweizig)
  2. Manual insertion using LSCdqInsert based on offline analysis by detector characterization investigators (Keith Riles)
Based on the information stored in the database, the following files are generated once per day (08:00 Eastern Time): Note that any given segment will retain the same numerical index in all versions of the lists, but it may acquire bad-flags indicating that it is bad or potentially bad.

The goal of this effort is to determine what data is suitable for searching for gravitational waves, and to provide this information in a machine-readable form. The success of this effort will depend on individuals examining the data, identifying effects which might cause the data to be bad, and then evaluating which effects are serious enough to disqualify data. Contributions are eagerly awaited; Keith Riles (kriles@umich.edu ) will collect this information and update the database accordingly.


Caution:

Please do not apply DQ flags in your analysis indiscriminately. The severity of DQ flags varies considerably. Some flags (e.g., OUT_OF_LOCK or AS_TRIGGER) should be applied by every analysis, but other flags (e.g., LIGHTDIP_02_PERCENT) may be unimportant to some analyses. Also, for analyses requiring large contiguous blocks of good data, e.g., for spectral noise estimation, it may be wiser to apply short-lived DQ flags (e.g., LIGHTDIP_5PERCENT) as post-processing vetoes rather than to fragment the data prior to processing.

Other cautions


Link to information on defined data quality flags


Segment files

Copies of science & injection segment files dumped each day from the database: (last updated January 29, 2008)
Current data quality segment files (which undergo frequent updating) are available for H1, H2, and L1.