Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:09:12 -0500
From: Gabriela Gonzalez <gonzalez@lsu.edu>
To: Keith Riles <keithr@tenaya.physics.lsa.umich.edu>
Cc: John Zweizig <jzweizig@ligo.caltech.edu>,
     Ed Daw <edaw@lsuligo.phys.lsu.edu>,
     Peter Fritschel <fritschel_p@ligo.mit.edu>,
     Brian O'Reilly <irish@ligo-la.caltech.edu>,
     Rauha Rahkola <rrahkola@darkwing.uoregon.edu>,
     Robert Schofield <rmss@conch.uoregon.edu>,
     Peter Shawhan <shawhan_p@ligo.caltech.edu>,
     Stan Whitcomb <stan@ligo.caltech.edu>, Daniel Sigg <sigg_d@ligo.mit.edu>,
     Rana Adhikari <rana@ligo-la.caltech.edu>
Subject: S2 Data Quality: H1 vetos from minute trends

Hi Keith (and all),

I put together all the information I gathered from minute trends about
H1 in a document, posted in

http://www.phys.lsu.edu/faculty/gonzalez/S2Trends/H1ASQOutliersVetoes.pdf

I propose in this document times to veto in H1, based on two criteria:

* ASQ glitches occurring in clusters, visible in other channels (so I
propose to veto a time interval that contains the glitches, but also
minutes in between)

* outliers in ASQ visible in other channels, other than ASI. Most of
these are isolated, or in consecutive minutes.

I put the TeX source of the document, which includes the list of the
outliers and times to veto.

Let me know what you think. I will try to do the same for the other ifos.

Gaby.

###################################################
Gabriela Gonzalez
Assistant Professor

   Department of Physics and Astronomy
   Louisiana State University
   202 Nicholson Hall
   Tower Drive
   Baton Rouge,LA 70803

   Phone: (225) 578 0468
   Email: gonzalez@lsu.edu
   http://www.phys.lsu.edu/faculty/gonzalez/

##################################################