Performance comparison between YBoost and Boost

==> without Dirt Events

• 653,590 osc nue with numuflux and 5,562,947 may06 CV cocktail events  are used for the comparison
  
• Oscillation nue sensitivity(no dirt) with preselection cuts, uz<0.9, 0.1<Enuqe<1.2 GeV and Boosting PID cut
• Contamination ratio(=bkgd eff / signal eff) versus signal efficiency
• Signal eff, bkgd eff and cont. ratio versus Enuqe for fixed cont. ratio = 0.6% (eff is relative to preselection cuts)
  
• Signal eff, bkgd eff and cont. ratio versus Enuqe for all cuts(precuts through pidcuts), eff is relative to R_gen < 500 cm
• Osc nue ccqe signal events, signal eff and bkgd eff versus Enuqe for dm^2=0.4 eV^2 and for dm^2=1.0 eV^2 with all cuts(precuts through pidcuts), eff is relative to R_gen < 500 cm
• Signal eff, bkgd eff and cont. ratio versus Enuqe for pidcut only, eff is relative to preselection cuts, uz<0.9, 0.1<Enuqe<1.2 GeV

• MM talk, May06 Baseline PID Data/MC and Boost/YBoost Comparison, Yong Liu, 07/28/2006
• MM talk, Update(III) of PID Tuning and Osc Nue Sensitivity, Hai-Jun Yang, 07/28/2006

==> with Dirt Events

•  653,590 osc nue with numuflux and 3,030439 may06 CV dirtMC
• Oscillation nue sensitivity(with 3M dirtMC) with preselection cuts, uz<0.9, 0.1<Enuqe<1.2 GeV, Rtwbc>200 cm and Boosting PID cut
• Contamination ratio(=bkgd eff / signal eff) versus signal efficiency
• Signal eff, bkgd eff and cont. ratio versus Enuqe for all cuts(precuts through pidcuts), eff is relative to R_gen < 500 cm
• Signal eff, bkgd eff and cont. ratio versus Enuqe for pidcut only, eff is relative to preselection cuts, uz<0.9, 0.1<Enuqe<1.2 GeV,Rtwbc>200 cm